Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2
Bone-Implant Contact and Bone Quality: Evaluation of Expected and Actual Bone Contact on Machined and Osseotite Implant Surfaces
Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39
Follow Us      

LOGIN

   Official Journal of The Academy of Osseointegration

 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 22 , Issue 6
November/December 2002

Pages 535–545


Bone-Implant Contact and Bone Quality: Evaluation of Expected and Actual Bone Contact on Machined and Osseotite Implant Surfaces

Paolo Trisi, DDS, PhD, Richard Lazzara, DDS, Walter Rao, MD, DDS, Alberto Rebaudi, MD, DDS


PMID: 12516825
DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.0501

This article introduces a new technique using histomorphometrics to estimate the extent of bone-to-implant contact that might be expected on an implant surface in relation to the quality of the surrounding bone. Two implant surfaces, one machined and one Osseotite, were compared on the same implant in the same patient. Eleven of these custom-made 2-mm-diameter implants were placed in the posterior maxilla and allowed to integrate. After 6 months of nonloaded healing, implants were trephined with surrounding bone tissue and prepared into histologic sections. Digitized images were analyzed at 50 magnification with image-analysis software. Bone surface area was calculated over the entire microscopic field, and the actual bone-to-implant contact for each implant surface was measured. The expected bone-to-implant contact was calculated by superimposing the profile of the implant threads on the bone image a small increment (0.15, 0.5, or 1.0 mm) from the actual implant site and counting the linear amount of bone that would be in contact with the implant surface. The actual bone-to-implant contact for Osseotite was greater than its expected bone-to-implant contact, whereas the actual bone-to-implant contact for the machined surface was mostly lower than the expected values. Thus, the Osseotite surface appears to exert a positive effect on the amount of bone approaching the implant surface and can be described as conductive, while the machined surface is nonconductive. This technique may serve to predict the clinical success that the Osseotite surface will demonstrate in poor-quality bone. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:535–545.)


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

PRD Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help